Within a span of little over 6 months, TROs (Temporary
Restraining Order) filed through the SJ City Attorney’s Office for
Councilmember Peter Ortiz and by the SJ City Attorney’s Office on behalf of Councilmember
Bien Doan appeared in the news for public peruse and debate. The civil harassment lawsuits were against constituents who expressed strong statements against the councilmembers. It is quite rare
for elected officials to file harassment lawsuits against public/press
criticism and rhetoric.
Coincidentally, both of the TROs were approved by Judge
Johanna Thai Van Dat of Santa Clara County Superior Court and subsequently struck
down by Judge Eric Geffon.
Peter Ortiz vs. Robert Saenz
In a Dec 2023 court filing, Peter Ortiz claimed Robert
Saenz, a local blogger (East Side San Jose Times), harassed him with defamatory
statements against his support of LGBTQ issues.
Ortiz claimed that the harassment caused him to be in fear of possible violence
from right-wing extremists which might lead to physical harm to him and his
girlfriend. Judge Geffon dismissed the
case in April 2024 citing that the harassment is nothing more than political
speech protected by the First Amendment on a topic of public interest. Furthermore, there was no evidence that
Saenz’s statements constituted threats of anything other than political
consequences.
As reported by the Davis Vanguard News, Saenz said: “Peter
Ortiz misused his power and disrespected those who put him in office by trying
to silence criticism from San Jose’s East Side community”
Bien Doan vs. Hai Huynh
The civil harassment lawsuit of Bien Doan vs. Hai Huynh was
filed in March 2024 with SJC Councilmember Doan requesting a temporary restraining
order prohibiting 300 yards of distance. Doan alleged that Huynh had threatened
him on three different occasions and caused him to fear for himself and his
parents. He alleged that Huynh is a gangster,
and his associates are known to commit violent crimes. In the July 2024 two day court hearing in
front of Judge Eric Geffon for a permanent restraining order, SJC Deputy
Attorney Maren Clouse representing Doan and Huynh’s legal defense team of Minh
Steven DoVan, Patrick J. Evans and Michael Luu tried to convince the court of
their side of the story.
He Said, She Said Incidents?
To establish a credible threat to be granted a permanent
restraining order, Doan tried to show the court the recurring threats received
and how they had jeopardized his safety.
His claim of three incidents were rebuked by Huynh’s legal defense team
that they did not occur and had they happened, it would have been politically speech
in nature. On the first day of the hearing, Doan tried to
paint the picture that Huynh is a criminal because of a criminal indictment (which was later
dropped) while working for Bay 101 Casino more than 25 years ago. Doan also testified
that Huynh in the past also had threatened Bryan Do, a campaign supporter advising Mayor Matt
Mahan during the 2022 San Jose mayoral race, and June Tran, owner of Crema
Café, also a strong supporter of Mahan.
12/18/2022 Phone Call
A December phone call between him and Huynh occurred where
Huynh allegedly said in Vietnamese:” Don’t mess with my brother.” The term was perceived to him as a
threat. Huynh showed cell phone records where no calls were made or received. Doan did not
show any evidence of any existing phone calls.
Huynh however
recalled a conversation with Doan on June 30, 2022, where Phuong (Peter)
Nguyen, an aide to State Senator Dave Cortese, asked him to speak to Doan. Phuong (Peter) told Doan that he had evidence
that Doan might violate campaign finance law and he would expose him. Doan threatened to sue Phuong (Peter) for
libel at which Phuong was afraid and asked Huynh to help settle the
dispute.
9/12/2023 Paloma Café Meeting
According to the complaint, a September meeting was set up
by David Duong, CEO of California Waste Solutions, at Paloma Café. Doan alleged that Huynh told him in
Vietnamese, “You better be afraid of me.”
Doan testified in court that he understood the statement to mean that he
could or would cause Doan physical harm
David Duong was subpoenaed by the City as their star
witness. He testified that he had not talked
to Huynh for over 8 years, but texted Huynh 3 times in September to arrange
a meeting to discuss Huynh’s writing in an email group that his community
organization, Vietnamese American Business Association ((VABA), has a close tie
with the Vietnamese communist government. He said
they resolved their differences at the meeting and subsequently texted Doan to join them for he wanted to make peace between the two. Doan and Huynh met and talked briefly at his
behest, but he did not listen to the conversation since he had to step outside
to take a phone call.
When asked about Huynh’s reputation by City Attorney
Clouse, he said Huynh is known as a “Godfather” figure for his criminal reputation. When asked if he is afraid of Huynh, Duong
laughed and said: “… everybody is afraid of Hai Huynh in the community except
me because I am richer”
Huynh’s defense showed the meeting never took place on that
date and even if it did, Huynh never said those words. However, Huynh testified that he had text messages from Duong asking for a
meeting on June 30, 2023. Duong took Doan with him and met
with Huynh for over 40 minutes at Paloma Café but again no threatening language
was used, according to Huynh.
As a side note, David Duong and his son, Andy Duong, are being investigated
by the FBI, IRS and US Postal Services for possible illegal political campaign contributions.
A grand jury has been convened to look at possible criminal charges based on
documents and information obtained from a recent raid by search warrant of his
house, his son’s house, and California Waste Solutions headquarters. To further the legal drama, Duong has recently filed a defamation lawsuit against Huynh for calling him a communist lackey. The anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss the case will be heard on August 6 at Santa Clara County Superior Court.
Sept 2023 Flag- Raising Ceremony
Doan claimed that Huynh confronted him at a flag-raising
ceremony in the Vietnamese Heritage Garden, San Jose, with finger-pointing and
yelling at him. The video obtained showed no such confrontation. The testimony from the ceremony organizer, Trieu Ha, and one of the attendees, county supervisor candidate Betty Duong, also
collaborated there was no such incident.
To support the unsubstantiated story, City Attorney
Clouse subpoenaed Tara Dang as a last-minute rebuttal witness. Dang is an aide to Mayor Matt Mahan who was
at the ceremony with the mayor. She
claimed to have witnessed a heated argument between Doan and Huynh. She could not hear the two men because she
was too far away and also was in the process of leaving.
“No Sufficient Evidence to Sustain the Proof”
It took about 15 minutes for Judge Geffon to reach his
decision of not granting the permanent restraining order. He stated he did not believe that Huynh is a
gangster as being portraited, especially with all the business licenses Huynh has (Real
estate broker, tax prepare services, and bail bond).
He emphasized two things that helped his conclusion that the petition
(Doan) was not in danger of physical threats and his safety was not jeopardized
to warrant a restraining order.
First, the texting between the petition and respondent on
June 18, 2023, where Huynh told Doan not to tell people incorrectly that Huynh
is a convicted criminal, if continues, he will sue for defamation. And Doan responded: “I will advise the City
Attorney and SJPD of your threats.”
The judge pointed
out that this was almost 7 months after the alleged threat of “Don’t mess with
my brother” which caused Doan to be in fear of his life. Along with Doan attending a Feb 2024 campaign
fundraising event for Betty Duong that Huynh organized and both sitting at the
same table cordially, Judge Geffon concluded: “This is not a person who is walking
fear of someone”
The second thing Judge Geffon noted: “One thing that stood
out during the testimony was Mr. David Duong’s statement that everybody is afraid
of Hai Huynh except me because I am richer.” This comment helped change the
context of the alleged threats by Huynh.
To him, David Duong meant that people are perceived to be afraid of Huynh
because of the wealthy businessman image he conveys and the political power that comes with it. Thus,
whatever the alleged threatening comments by Huynh to Doan, if they happened,
“… is not a threat to do bodily harm, a person would not show their wealthy side if they intend to physically harm someone”.
Anti-Communist Sentiment and Divided Politics
Huynh’s defense team tried to paint the alleged incidents have
their roots in anti-communist political discourse between Doan, David Duong,
and Huynh.
Attorney Minh Steven Dovan spoke about the anti-communist
sentiment in the community and how Huynh called out David Duong and his
community group VABA for their close working relationship with the communist
government. The conspiracy Dovan tried
to bring up but could not articulate because Judge Geffon did not allow it
since he did not see the relevance to the restraining order hearing - Councilmember
Doan is close to David Duong, which makes the anti-communist activists perceive
him as a pro-Communist. The community does not like an elected official to be
pro-Communist, especially one of their own. This lawsuit is about silencing Huynh and his
anti-communist rhetoric. The strong support
for such a claim was heightened when David Duong took a stand as the star witness
against Huynh.
Huynh gave a short interview to San Jose Spotlight right
after the hearing, he said: “I’m
very happy. This is the right ruling. People tried to silence me because I
tried to expose pro-Communists and pay-to-play in the city of San Jose for a
long time.”
San Jose Spotlight also reported
that Doan declined their interview request.
Epilogue
The Vietnamese-American community in San Jose is active
politically in their anti-communist stand and the vocal community activists
are staunch anti-communist in their rhetoric.
Most elected officials are aware of such sentiment and trying to play to
this by promoting the former Republic of Vietnam flag and declaring resolutions
of not associating with the communist government. David Duong in the last 15 years has been a
thorn to the anti-communist activists for flaunting in the media his relationships
with paramount communist leaders. The paradox of course is that Duong supported
so many Vietnamese-American elected officials with generous campaign donations that
in many ways, he is politically influential and considered a kingmaker in the
community with his connections and lavish spending on politicians.
Attorney Dovan lamented in his closing statement that the Viet
community is not united. He declared: “That is a fact” and the lawsuit is a microcosm
of the ongoing division among members of the community, specifically the older generation
who were in their 20s and 30s during the Vietnam War, on the anti-communist issue.
Even though the court hearing was only attended by a dozen
people, one of the attendees who did not want their name disclosed noted
poignantly: “The crux of the trial is more about political speech and the First
Amendment from being abused and silent”.
Dear Chief Paul Joseph,
I am writing to you with deep concern regarding an incident that took place yesterday involving a physical altercation between the San Jose mayor’s security detail and a pedestrian. As the President of the San Jose Silicon Valley NAACP, I feel compelled to address this issue and share my perspectives on the matter.
Upon viewing the video of the incident, I was troubled by the rapid escalation of the situation into a physical altercation. It was distressing to witness the lack of attempts at de-escalation from the officers involved, and I believe this raises questions about the adequacy of their de-escalation training. In any situation where conflicts arise, it is critical for law enforcement officers to prioritize de-escalation techniques to ensure the safety and well-being of all individuals involved.
The officer involved in the altercation did not clearly identify himself as a law enforcement officer, and it appears that there was no legal basis for instructing the pedestrian to move from his location in a public space. The pedestrian’s reaction, although stating a warning, should have been met with a more measured response from the officer, considering the circumstances.
Furthermore, the presence of what seemed to be an object, possibly a metal rod, being thrown into the frame of the camera from outside raises serious concerns about the intentions behind this act. This action added a dangerous element to an already tense situation and warrants a thorough investigation to determine the source and purpose of the object.
Additionally, the bystanders’ reactions to the altercation were also troubling. Instead of intervening or seeking help, many individuals appeared passive, choosing to record the incident on their cell phones instead. This lack of active involvement from bystanders highlights the need for community education on how to safely and effectively intervene in such situations to prevent further escalation or harm.
As the head of the San Jose Police Department, I urge you to conduct a comprehensive review of the incident, including the actions of all parties involved, to ensure accountability and transparency. It is imperative that all officers receive ongoing training in de-escalation techniques and conflict resolution to handle challenging situations effectively and with respect for all individuals’ rights.
I also request that you provide updates on the investigation and any steps taken to address the concerns raised by this incident. Our community looks to law enforcement for protection and support, and it is essential that the public trust in the integrity and professionalism of our police force is maintained.
I am more than willing to discuss this matter further and collaborate on initiatives to improve police-community relations and ensure that incidents like this are addressed promptly and justly. Together, we can work towards a safer and more inclusive environment for all residents of San Jose.
Sincerely,
Rev. Jethroe Moore II
President
San Jose Silicon Valley NAACP